Accidentally, I've managed to have this as part of a Create Database:
... FILENAME = N'C:\MSSQL\Data\\\testdb_Log.LDF' ...
, notice the triple backslash. The Create Database statement works fine,
and sp_helpdb says the log file name is:
C:\MSSQL\Data\\\testdb_Log.LDF
I noticed the MSDOS command prompt also allows multiple backslashes,
they're reduced to one when performing the command and I guess
SQL Server does the same thing, so no problem so far really.
But is it supposed to work this way? Quite confusing, isn't it?Not sure if it supposed to work that way, but it would get quite confusing after a while. It may even give you "unexpected results" if you detach and try to reattach the files. If you can get away with it, I would heartily suggest getting the files renamed.|||This sounds like a question for Old Man Phelan.|||It gets better... This actually goes back to the Unix days, and has to do with how pathing is logically based. Just for jolly factors, try to explain the difference between:dir c:\windows\\system32
dir c:\\windows\system32Why does one work, and one fail? What causes the time lag? What did you really do?
Answers will follow, but I'd love to hear folks try to talk this fiasco out a bit first.
-PatP|||Hmnmm...I got a network path not found message from the second one. I am going to guess that the system is interpreting this as "Using the protocol 'C', go to the machine called 'Windows', and get the file called 'System32'". The delay is caused by waiting for all of the DNS servers to chime in saying "Nope. No server called 'Windows' here." Still no idea why the first example works, though.|||Hello Pat I can proof both of your lines correct ;)
check this
for
dir c:\windows\\system32
c:\windows\ md (alt+092)system32
dir c:\\windows\system32
c:\md (alt+092)windows
Now both are valid folders and path too... ;)
Put your Numlock on and type numbers from there|||Hmnmm...I got a network path not found message from the second one. I am going to guess that the system is interpreting this as "Using the protocol 'C', go to the machine called 'Windows', and get the file called 'System32'". The delay is caused by waiting for all of the DNS servers to chime in saying "Nope. No server called 'Windows' here." Still no idea why the first example works, though.Bingo! Full marks for that half of the problem!
Now to give a few more clues on the first half of the problem...
dir c:\windows\system32\.\
dir c:\windows\system32\..\
dir c:\windows\system32\..\.\
dir c:\windows\system32\..\..\What do "dot" and "double dot" refer to? Based on that answer, why is an empty reference logically the same as a "dot" reference?
NOTE: If you have only worked with Microsoft Operating Systems, you are at a sore disadvantage here. This is another clue.
-PatP|||It may even give you "unexpected results" if you detach and try to reattach the files. If you can get away with it, I would heartily suggest getting the files renamed.
That's how I noticed it, I was trying to attach a database
file when I got an error message because the referred Log file didn't exist. Then I happened
to notice the double backslash in the Log file name. This wasn't the cause of the error though, the file
was simply missing. But, no idea how the double backslash got there!|||But, no idea how the double backslash got there!My first guess would be a typo (fat fingers, flying furiously, flubbing fiendishly). My next guess would be a keyboard problem (key bounce). Next would be a numeric directory name typed with Num Lock turned off... After that, I'd give up!
-PatP|||Bingo! Full marks for that half of the problem!
Now to give a few more clues on the first half of the problem...
dir c:\windows\system32\.\
dir c:\windows\system32\..\
dir c:\windows\system32\..\.\
dir c:\windows\system32\..\..\What do "dot" and "double dot" refer to? Based on that answer, why is an empty reference logically the same as a "dot" reference?
NOTE: If you have only worked with Microsoft Operating Systems, you are at a sore disadvantage here. This is another clue.
-PatP
. refers to the current directory you are in (i.e. c:\windows\system32\.\ is the c:\windows\system32 directory.)
.. refers to the parent directory of the one you are in (i.e c:\windows\system32\.. refers to c:\windows directory.)
so the ..\..\ would put you at the c:\WINDOWS folder.
[EDIT ... I typed too fast] ... ..\..\ puts you at the root of the C drive!|||Hmm. I am still a touch confused about the empty reference. When you type in
dir \
or
cd \
You end up referring to the root of the current drive. dir \\ gives you
C:\Documents and Settings\mcrowley>dir \\
The filename, directory name, or volume label syntax is incorrect.
Hmm...It may be time to dust off the Linux test machine...|||\\ on some systems means referring to a network
computer.|||My first guess ...
It's a SP who makes up the filename I think.
I'll have to trace myself through the code. Funny it
hasn't occurred when we've been using the same SP
before.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment